TECHNICAL BLOG
Deep Dives for Engineers
Detailed technical articles covering the real problems we solve in embedded systems, AI, and robotics engineering.
Detailed technical articles covering the real problems we solve in embedded systems, AI, and robotics engineering.
Memory safety bugs—use-after-free, buffer overflows, data races—account for a large portion of critical embedded CVEs.
In embedded products, bugs don’t just crash an app — they can brick devices, trigger watchdog resets, or become security vulnerabilities. Historically, a large percentage of critical CVEs in embedded Linux and firmware come from memory-unsafe code: buffer overflows, use-after-free, and data races.
Rust gives you C-like performance while preventing many of these failure modes at compile time. It’s not “magic,” but it changes the default outcome: unsafe patterns become explicit and reviewable instead of accidental.
Bare-metal Rust typically uses:
no_std: no OS, no standard library.// Cargo.toml (conceptual)
[dependencies]
cortex-m = "0.7"
cortex-m-rt = "0.7"
panic-halt = "0.2"
// main.rs
#![no_std]
#![no_main]
use cortex_m_rt::entry;
use panic_halt as _;
#[entry]
fn main() -> ! {
// init clocks, gpio, peripherals here
loop {
// your main loop
}
}
If you have an existing C codebase, rewrite everything is rarely realistic. A practical approach:
Rust doesn’t replace embedded engineering — it makes unsafe failures harder to ship by accident.
Rust is a strong fit for modern embedded systems where reliability and security matter. Start small, be disciplined with unsafe code, and treat the toolchain as part of your production infrastructure. With the right approach, you’ll ship fewer critical bugs without sacrificing performance.
Continue reading — handpicked articles you might enjoy